The media is covering up this scandal involving this First Lady

The media kicked the smear machine into overdrive the moment Donald Trump wrapped up the election.

Now the attacks are extending to his wife.

And the media is engaged in a major cover-up.

Recently, supermodel Emily Ratajkowski fired off a series of tweets about an offensive remark made by a New York Times reporter about the First Lady.

Ratajkowski stated that the reporter called Trump a “hooker.”

The Times reprimanded the reporter, but has so far refused to divulge the identity of the individual who spread lies and falsehoods about the First Lady.

This is a cover up to protect their anti-Trump partisan who was spreading defamatory information about the First Lady.

Politico reports:

Editors at the New York Times have reprimanded a reporter for referring to first lady Melania Trump as a “hooker” at an event Sunday night, calling the remarks “completely inappropriate.”

The reporter in question, who has not been identified by the paper, came under fire Monday morning after supermodel Emily Ratajkowski made the reporter’s remarks public in a series of tweets. Ratajkowski, who said the reporter made the remarks while sitting next to her at a New York Fashion Week event, called the comment “disgusting sexist bull—t.”

“At a party last night, a Times reporter who does not cover Washington or politics, referred to an unfounded rumor regarding Melania Trump,” a Times spokesperson said in a statement to POLITICO. “The comment was not intended to be public, but it was nonetheless completely inappropriate and should not have occurred. Editors have talked to the reporter in question about the lapse.”

The Times reporter was parroting a lie about Melania Trump that has been peddled by liberal bloggers and the media.

Trump has already settled one defamation lawsuit against a left-wing blogger in Maryland who had falsely asserted she worked as an escort.

Rueters reports:

“First lady Melania Trump has settled a defamation lawsuit for a “substantial sum” against a Maryland blogger who wrote about unsubstantiated rumors she had worked as an escort and falsely said she suffered a breakdown, Trump’s lawyer said on Tuesday.

“I acknowledge that these false statements were very harmful and hurtful to Mrs. Trump and her family, and therefore I sincerely apologize to Mrs. Trump, her son, her husband and her parents for making these false statements,” the blogger, Webster Tarpley, wrote in a statement released by Trump’s lawyer.

A lawyer for Tarpley confirmed the accuracy of the statement in an email and said the case had been resolved. Neither side would divulge the amount of the settlement, though Trump’s lawyer Charles Harder called it a “substantial sum.”

Others pointed out the double standard in the media.

Critics contended there is zero chance the media would have conspired to conceal the identity of a reporter who referred to Michelle Obama as a “hooker.”

There is little chance any reporter who even cared to say Michelle Obama was anything less than a combination of the Virgin Mary, Joan of Arc and Queen Elizabeth I would be protected, let alone fired and run out of the journalism profession.


  1. The reporter got her whores mixed up between Daniels and Melanie. One is married and having her sex with her husband. On the other hand Daniels is having sex with anybody as long as they put the green stuff in her hands.

  2. This “reporter” should be working for a rag like we see in grocery stores. Unfounded accusations yet she posts it on Twitter – of course, the president uses Twitter – what better place to assault his wife’s integrity and start chaos? First it was an assault on Trump himself, the their son, Baron(inexcusable) and now Melania. These people are morally bankrupt and will do anything to get attention.

  3. Big media enjoy the same civil right affirmed by the Constitution for all of us. Problem is an individual who labels someone a whore will be charged with the crime of libel. When big media do it, lawyers make trials cost prohibitive. The times refused to identify the liar because in a contest with a billionaire and sitting president, the trial might be worthwhile. They might also fear for her life.

  4. HOOKER? I do believe the lady in question IS married to the President and has a son by him PRIOR to his being elected. That claim is probably made by a Democrat that is trying, by assumption, to make Whores and gigolos out of ALL Rebublicans because Hillary lost after claiming to close all coal mines and eliminating the Second Amendment because it interferred with her “gun control” ideas. Now there are “spontaneous” demonstrations (with professional made signs) encouranging employees to “walk off their jobs” not realising there are 3 people waiting to take that job. Looks like a set-up by O’Bama and Hillary supporters.

  5. They see her as the weaker link of the “Trump family” and I think it is very mean for she did not run for President and neither did her son Baron. I think the media has not news and is just filling it up like People magazine does so when they do this they are not a NEWS organization but a rag like Star, or Esquire.

  6. I am so sick of watching the antics of this party that has the nerve to
    call itself “Democratic Party”. They are nothing more than a bunch of Leftist Thugs who have taken over the former Democratic Party and are now trying to take over our country by any means possible. Before this year, I was a Democrat since the 1970s. However, I could see what was happening to the party and to our country, so I dropped from their voter roles and joined the Republican Party. They are acting like such a bunch of morons, that I have actually now started to hate them. I am just an ordinary person who has always voted; but, never paid that much attention to politics and what was really going on. That has all changed in the last 16 years. I have known since the 1980s that the press was heading toward more of a propaganda machine than any thing else. Back in 1980, I followed a story in the newspaper which I was thoroughly interested in. I was living in NY and there were several newspapers available there at the time. Everyone of them, every single day gave a different set of facts regarding the story that was being covered by all of them. From that day forward, I never absolutely believed everything I read in the papers.

  7. The media is putting all of the same effort to smear President Trump as they did to cover up for Obama. I wouldn’t by Time magazine nor any other Time Warner product ever again. I hope they go as bankrupt as their morals soon.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.