Omarosa stepped forward with the smoking gun Mueller was desperate to find

Omarosa’s outrageous revenge tour took a shocking turn.

The disgraced former White House staffer was interviewed on MSNBC about dirt she possessed on Donald Trump.

That’s when she claimed to have the smoking gun that would make Robert Mueller’s day.

Omarosa was interviewed by Katy Tur about her book “Unhinged.”


Omarosa was fired from the White House for unprofessional behavior.

Now she is out for payback and she is holding nothing back.

During the course of the interview, Omarosa claimed Trump had advanced knowledge of WikiLeaks releasing hacked emails belonging to the Democrat National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta.

The Daily Mail reports:

The former White House official, campaign aide, and reality TV star made the claim, without providing any details, in an interview Tuesday with MSNBC amid a furor over her new book, ‘Unhinged.’

‘There is a lot of corruption that went on both in the campaign and in the White House and I’m going to blow the whistle on all of it,’ vowed the former Trump protege turned self-styled whistleblower…

Host Katy Tur pressed Omarosa on whether Trump knew about Hillary Clinton emails in advance of publication by WikiLeaks – a topic at the heart of the Mueller Russia probe.

‘Absolutely. Yes. Yes,’ she responded. But Manigault Newman, who confirmed she has spoken to Mueller’s investigators, provided no corroborating information.

Asked if Trump should be afraid of more tapes in her possession,’ she didn’t give a direct answer. ‘I think he should be afraid of being exposed as the misogynist, the bigot and the racist that he is.’

Omarosa is not a credible witness.


Tur pressed her for evidence and Omarosa would provide no proof to back up her bombshell allegation.

No other witness has come forward or documents have been produced that would corroborate the claim that Trump colluded with the Russians.

We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this story.

Loading...

8 Comments

  1. Basically due to her background she is an unreliable witness who will lie to anthing she can for monetary gain, she is a conniver!

  2. George, so right. And not only a nut job but could be considered a psycho. Can’t believe she has not been arrested for inciting violence. How does that woman keep her seat. If she is considered okay, we are in bigger trouble than we think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*