Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the leader of the Supreme Court’s liberal bloc.
That means Ginsburg charts the course of the Left’s legal theories.
But Ruth Bader Ginsberg just wrote something that will leave you speechless.
The Supreme Court reversed a Seventh Circuit Court ruling blocking an Indiana law that mandated the remains of an aborted baby be buried or cremated.
Ginsburg dissented from that opinion.
That is not unusual.
Ginsburg is the queen of abortion on the Supreme Court.
But her dissent made a jaw-dropping claim.
Ginsburg argued that a woman that aborted her baby was not a “mother.”
Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”
“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.
As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.
The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.
Ginsburg took her pro-abortion radicalism to a new level with her dissent.
She officially made it clear that she thinks pregnant women are not carrying human lives inside them by claiming that they are not mothers.
We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.